[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: Is this list alive?
seems were getting alive after some hibernation :)
multias were thought as "thin"-clients (yeah, with alpha-cpu....)
they also have often troubles with the memories. this might explain
compile and / or segfaults. those machines are no servers!
74F623 might also be an issue, never forget for what those machines were
On Fri, 2012-12-21 at 14:04 -0500, Dave McGuire wrote:
> On 12/21/2012 12:48 AM, Bill Roman wrote:
> >> the multias are pathetic, not stable....
> > Perhaps... but they're *cute* :-)
> > I have one (well, more than one, but the others are for parts). I've
> > played around with NetBSD 4 and 5 on it, and I'm getting ready to try
> > again with 6.0.
> > I had noticed some apparent stability problems -- random compile errors
> > and segfaults while building a kernel, never reproducible. I was going
> > to try swapping some parts around, figuring it was some marginal
> > hardware somewhere.
> > But if it's a general Multia issue, I don't want to waste time on it.
> > So -- is anyone else with a Multia finding it's "not stable"?
> I did, when I ran a few. I have one now that I haven't fired up in a
> long time. But Back In The Day(tm), before I realized it was a crap
> design, I had lots of overheating problems with them, and later the
> infamous "fried 74F623" issue. I replaced about half a dozen of those.
> If you haven't put a heat sink on your Multia's 74F623 chip, I would
> suggest doing so when you can.
Main Index |
Thread Index |