On Fri, Dec 31, 2004 at 04:51:13PM +1100, Simon Burge wrote:
> James Chacon wrote:
> 
> > Let's try this one instead. Less hacky overall I think and w. it all boot
> > blocks build again (basically we're back to the same outputs as binutils 2.14
> > I beleive)
> 
> I can confirm that these bootblocks work (at least, bootxx_ffs and boot
> do).

Good, because I've committed the changes :-) (Since I couldn't tell any
discernable difference between them and the 2.14 created ones after 
successfully stripping out .eh_frame)

James