Subject: Re: KLH10 Compile question and an answer!! Success!
To: None <email@example.com>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
Date: 05/10/2003 16:03:39
> Nonsense. I seem to recall that identifiers that end in _t are
> reserved for the system in ISO C,
Furrfu. It's getting to the point where it's difficult to find
identifiers that _aren't_ reserved.
> I.e. it's KLH10 that is buggy for defining its own vaddr_t and
> paddr_t types. Instead, it should choose another name, like
> "klh10_vaddr" and "klh10_paddr".
...until some genius of a language committee decides *addr should be
reserved too, at which point it will magically become buggy again?
No, I think it's the spec that's buggy here. Especially when they
preempt something as widespread and useful as _t.
_[A-Z]*, __*, E*, *_t, probably a bunch more I've never heard of...how
is the poor application author supposed to know?
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML firstname.lastname@example.org
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B