Subject: Re: HELP!
To: Dave McGuire <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: linc <email@example.com>
Date: 06/21/2001 09:53:50
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Dave McGuire wrote:
> Seti@Home isn't a very good benchmark. The Seti@Home folks are of
> the "all the world's a PeeCee" mindset and have put huge amounts of
> work into optimizing the Intel clients, and comparatively little into
> other processors.
> This is YET ANOTHER reason why I abandoned that project some time ago
> despite the fact that I think the idea is extremely cool.
> -Dave McGuire
I figured that as well - thinking that maybe the code is not optimised. I
do like the idea though and really want to be able to get through some
packets in a reasonable amount of time. Just don't want to have to go out
and buy a fast PC to do it with. Rather stick to "better" archetecture
9:51am up 63 days, 21:49, 4 users, load average: 1.88, 1.84, 1.86