Subject: Re: Multia diagnostic translation needed
To: David Woyciesjes <DAW@yalepress3.unipress.yale.edu>
From: Manuel Bouyer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 06/11/2000 14:35:02
On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 10:10:59PM -0400, David Woyciesjes wrote:
> In conversing with mu brother over a couple of Coors today, we figure we'll
> replace the flash ROM chips. Being right next to the processor (I'm almost
> positive), good chance they got fried with help from the 233 MHz
> processor... if not, when I did the fail Safe and blast on my working 166, I
> got this...
> ROM BASE = 38400000; MFG ID = 89; DEV ID = bd ( <- might have been 'db')
> but if you recall, i got this from the bad machine...
> ROM BASE = 38400000; MFG ID = 89; DEV ID = 9d
> Wrong ROM vendor. AMD or Intel Parts expected.
> Sound like the flash ROM is limping along, dishing out wrong info, therefore
> screwing the firmware blast. Make sense?
Possible. Note that the difference between the two DEV ID is 0x20 again.
Manuel Bouyer <email@example.com>