Subject: Re: Problems with PC164SX and -current
To: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Jeff Roberson <email@example.com>
Date: 01/29/2000 19:51:12
I was just about to try and build current to see if that helps my DPWS
500a situation. I assume this means I should definately not do this then?
On Sat, 29 Jan 2000, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 17:38:57 -0800
> From: Jason Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> To: Ken Wellsch <email@example.com>
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: Re: Problems with PC164SX and -current
> On Sat, 29 Jan 2000 16:16:18 -0500 (EST)
> Ken Wellsch <email@example.com> wrote:
> > The last time I was able to "successfully" build -current on my PC164SX
> > was Dec 25th. Since then, when starting with a freshly built kernel (and
> > current -current) my "make build" tends to die. Earlier in January it
> > would fail with the huge clean in libc (massive argv list) - ending with
> > a signal 11 death. So I'd simply return to my old kernel and wait til
> > I was home again to try with a newer -current. With a fresh sup from
> > Friday (Jan 28) I see the following: with a new GENERIC kernel, as soon
> > as the new shared libc is installed, the next command faults with signal
> > 11. Lots of commands do (I suspect those relying on shared libc). I
> > happened to have an old system image circa last September, and when I
> > drop libc.so.12.45 in place, replacing the link to the current 12.54,
> > everything appears to work again. What the heck have I done wrong here?
> > Did I miss rebuilding some part that has left me in a dead-end state?
> > Thanks for any suggestions! -- Ken
> I noticed this to, and forgot to send a bug report. Foo.
> Anyhow, some of the delinting that was done to malloc.c is bogus, and
> causes death on the Alpha.
> I'll send a PR about it ASAP.
> -- Jason R. Thorpe <firstname.lastname@example.org>