On Thu, 21 Oct 1999 13:43:35 -0700 
 "R. C. Dowdeswell" <elric@mabelode.imrryr.org> wrote:

 > Yeah, although I did have a look at said code -- it doesn't really
 > look like there is a lot of acceleration in there.  (Only solid
 > fills).  I've been planning to put my accelerations in XF86 when
 > we move over to it.

For TGA, we should not use the current XF86 code.  We should use our
Sane Framebuffer Model when possible, and probably change XalphaNetBSD
to be XdecNetBSD, because it could work w/ e.g. SFB/SFB+, too.

        -- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@nas.nasa.gov>