Subject: Re: SRM vs ARC
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Dave McGuire <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 08/11/1997 18:01:39
On August 11, you wrote:
> > Christ...Typing "173000g" at the ODT prompt of a pdp11 is JUST AS
> >FUNCTIONAL a boot sequence as all that fancy crap on these new
> Not quite. With P1275 compliant boot roms, there's a host of
> configuration issues that can be tackled at booting. Granted,
> SRM is mostly wasted. As an example of usefulness, for thems
> that can actually do it, the forth monitor in a sparc or a
> powerpc can diagnose a lot of hardware problems.
Agreed...but I've always felt (IMHO) that configuration management
is the job of the operating system or an offline separately-bootable
diagnostic image. Yes, they're a pain, but for the frequency of their
use, I think they handle the job quite well.
My point is...ROMs should be simple, bulletproof, and as bug-free as
possible. Therefore, simplicity is called for. Non-ROM software is
much more easily updated, and as such, can afford to be more complex.
The flash approach (which I *really* like, by the way) that the Alpha
systems take is an interesting cross between the two.