gary%duzan.org@localhost <mailto:gary%duzan.org@localhost> wrote:
> In file included from strbuf.c:42:
> va_copy.h:48:2: error: #error "The compiler is broken!"
> In file included from xsprintf.c:46:
> va_copy.h:48:2: error: #error "The compiler is broken!"
> gmake[2]: *** [depend] Error 1
> gmake[2]: Leaving directory
> `/usr/pkgsrc/wip/cc65/work.x86_64/cc65-2.12.0/src/common'
> gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 2
(Changing group. Please remove pkgsrc-wip-review from replies.)
The following comment was the response I received from the developer:
{{{ This means that the compiler claims to be compliant to an ANSI or ISO
standard before C99 but defines va_copy anyway. If the former is true,
va_copy is no reserved identifier and must not be defined by the compiler.
At least this is my interpretation of the standard is how other compilers
implement it. Maybe someone active in -BSD development can comment on it.
}}}
Any compiler experts reading?
Tim
--
Tim Larson AMT2 Unix Systems Administrator
InterCall, a division of West Corporation
Eschew obfuscation!
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08
_______________________________________________ pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review