pkgsrc-WIP-review archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pkg_select upgrade



On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 07:29:41AM +0100, Jachym Holecek wrote:
> > Build failed on NetBSD/amd64.
> >
> > [...]
> > 
> > I think we have two options.
> > Casting a variable to int in pkgselect source code or in ctype.h
> > 
> > Option #1 would be like this:
> > In ftpio.c file,
> > -                               if (ftprc && isdigit(buf[match.rm_so+1]))
> > +                               if (ftprc && 
> > isdigit((int)buf[match.rm_so+1]))
> > 
> > And here is option #2:
> > In /usr/src/include/ctype.h file,
> > -#define isdigit(c)      ((int)((_ctype_ + 1)[(c)] & _N))
> > +#define isdigit(c)      ((int)((_ctype_ + 1)[(int)(c)] & _N))
> 
> isdigit(3) says the prototype is "int isdigit(int c);", so #1 would seem
> correct.

No, it is completely wrong and the VERY reason that gcc gives a warning
in this case.

The domain of all the isxxx() functions is EOF plus all the values of
unsigned char, typically -1..255.  So if your signed char buf[n] contains
a negative value then the wrong things happen unless you cast to
unsigned char first.

Remember that isalpha() can be valid for -ve chars.

Of course, things will go terribly wrong if isdigit() returns non-zero
for anything other that '0'..'9'.

        David

-- 
David Laight: david%l8s.co.uk@localhost


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
pkgsrc-wip-review mailing list
pkgsrc-wip-review%lists.sourceforge.net@localhost
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pkgsrc-wip-review



Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index