brook%biology.nmsu.edu@localhost wrote: > I believe that the gdal package originated from our work so I'm glad > it is of use. However, we have recently split it into several > (gdal-lib, gdal-docs, and gdal (a metapackage)) so as to isolate the > dependencies on doxygen, teTeX, ... . Ah, that's nice. > If you could send me the updates you made to the gdal package we can > try to fold them into our new set. Or are those already committed in > wip? I don't know - I don't think there were many modifications. If you want to check the differences between wip and my package, just download my files from the URL in the previous mail and diff it against pkgsrc-wip. -Jan -- Information wants to be free.
Attachment:
pgpuLUOXYvoiV.pgp
Description: PGP signature