Subject: Re: [HEADS-UP] Changes in handling package licenses
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Greg Troxel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 10/17/2007 11:48:37
"Justin C. Sherrill" <email@example.com> writes:
> On Wed, October 17, 2007 7:12 am, Roland Illig wrote:
>> You probably don't have to change anything in your mk.conf file, as long
>> as you always _append_ the licenses to the ACCEPTED_LICENSES variable
>> (using "+=" instead of a simple "="). In this case, the Open Source
>> licenses will be automatically added to the acceptable licenses.
> For current installations, do we need to explicitly add the 'Open Source
> licenses' to the existing mk.conf?
No. The plan is that in license.mk there is a
DEFAULT_ACCEPTABLE_LICENSES that includes all Free Software and Open
Source licenses. Currently this is
gnu-gpl-v2 gnu-lgpl-v2 \
gnu-gpl-v3 gnu-lgpl-v3 \
original-bsd modified-bsd \
but it will grow as people go through pkgsrc and add free licenses as we
Roland's point was that if you do:
now, that unless you really mean to exclude free licenses, you should
(right now) change that to
so that when we add LICENSE=gnu-gpl-v2 to some package that you will
still be able to build it.