Subject: Re: converters/wv2 insists on libiconv
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/28/2007 14:18:13
On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 06:04:50PM +0300, Arto Huusko wrote:
> I'm on NetBSD (-current), which has an iconv of its own, so
> gnu libiconv should not be needed? Or does wv2 really need
> the GNU libiconv?
It might depend on GNU specific behaviour in a number of places, e.g.
silent handling of unconvertible characters etc. The package explicitly
requests GNU iconv.