Subject: Re: missing symlink in openoffice2-bin?
To: Greg Troxel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Johnny C. Lam <email@example.com>
Date: 08/23/2007 16:37:48
Greg Troxel wrote:
> Mark Davies <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Greg Troxel wrote:
>>> "Steven M. Bellovin" <email@example.com> writes:
>>>> cd /usr/pkg
>>>> ln -s emul/linux/openoffice.org2.2
>>>> Could someone check this? My setup is a bit odd.
>>> I am seeing this to, and that fixes things for me. But, I'm not at
>>> all sure what's correct. Is there a grand plan for where Linux
>>> programs live on NetBSD/i386? Sure, libraries unpacked from suse
>>> are in /emul/linux, but for example acroread7 installs under
>>> /usr/pkg but not emul. Perhaps the bug is that most of oo is in
>> Is this a recent change related to the new emulator framework? I
>> haven't installed openoffice2-bin in a month or so but it has always
>> installed directly into /usr/pkg for me.
> I think this behavior started with the new framework, but I'm not sure
> that it's intentional.
Yes, this was unintentional. I've fixed this on HEAD with a PKGREVISION
bump for openoffice2-bin.
-- Johnny Lam <firstname.lastname@example.org>