Subject: Re: missing symlink in openoffice2-bin?
To: Greg Troxel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Mark Davies <email@example.com>
Date: 08/21/2007 08:40:19
On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Greg Troxel wrote:
> "Steven M. Bellovin" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > cd /usr/pkg
> > ln -s emul/linux/openoffice.org2.2
> > Could someone check this? My setup is a bit odd.
> I am seeing this to, and that fixes things for me. But, I'm not at
> all sure what's correct. Is there a grand plan for where Linux
> programs live on NetBSD/i386? Sure, libraries unpacked from suse
> are in /emul/linux, but for example acroread7 installs under
> /usr/pkg but not emul. Perhaps the bug is that most of oo is in
Is this a recent change related to the new emulator framework? I
haven't installed openoffice2-bin in a month or so but it has always
installed directly into /usr/pkg for me.