Subject: Re: missing symlink in openoffice2-bin?
To: Mark Davies <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Greg Troxel <email@example.com>
Date: 08/20/2007 19:00:09
Mark Davies <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> On Tuesday 21 August 2007, Greg Troxel wrote:
>> "Steven M. Bellovin" <email@example.com> writes:
>> > cd /usr/pkg
>> > ln -s emul/linux/openoffice.org2.2
>> > Could someone check this? My setup is a bit odd.
>> I am seeing this to, and that fixes things for me. But, I'm not at
>> all sure what's correct. Is there a grand plan for where Linux
>> programs live on NetBSD/i386? Sure, libraries unpacked from suse
>> are in /emul/linux, but for example acroread7 installs under
>> /usr/pkg but not emul. Perhaps the bug is that most of oo is in
> Is this a recent change related to the new emulator framework? I
> haven't installed openoffice2-bin in a month or so but it has always
> installed directly into /usr/pkg for me.
I think this behavior started with the new framework, but I'm not sure
that it's intentional.