Subject: Re: missing symlink in openoffice2-bin?
To: Steven M. Bellovin <smb@cs.columbia.edu>
From: Greg Troxel <gdt@ir.bbn.com>
List: pkgsrc-users
Date: 08/20/2007 12:38:33
"Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@cs.columbia.edu> writes:

> I *think* there's a missing symlink in the openoffice2-bin package.
> The symlinks in pkg/bin don't resolve.  I think what's necessary is
>
> 	cd /usr/pkg
> 	ln -s emul/linux/openoffice.org2.2
>
> Could someone check this?  My setup is a bit odd.

I am seeing this to, and that fixes things for me.  But, I'm not at all
sure what's correct.  Is there a grand plan for where Linux programs
live on NetBSD/i386?  Sure, libraries unpacked from suse are in
/emul/linux, but for example acroread7 installs under /usr/pkg but not
emul.  Perhaps the bug is that most of oo is in emul/linux?