Subject: Re: missing symlink in openoffice2-bin?
To: Steven M. Bellovin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Greg Troxel <email@example.com>
Date: 08/20/2007 12:38:33
"Steven M. Bellovin" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I *think* there's a missing symlink in the openoffice2-bin package.
> The symlinks in pkg/bin don't resolve. I think what's necessary is
> cd /usr/pkg
> ln -s emul/linux/openoffice.org2.2
> Could someone check this? My setup is a bit odd.
I am seeing this to, and that fixes things for me. But, I'm not at all
sure what's correct. Is there a grand plan for where Linux programs
live on NetBSD/i386? Sure, libraries unpacked from suse are in
/emul/linux, but for example acroread7 installs under /usr/pkg but not
emul. Perhaps the bug is that most of oo is in emul/linux?