Subject: Re: Getting started with modular xorg
To: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <email@example.com>
Date: 08/06/2007 13:31:41
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 10:36:18PM -0400, Blair Sadewitz wrote:
> Well, what I meant is "should I add more options to its options.mk".
> The last time I tried it with xaw.buildlink3.mk, it didn't link to it.
> I'll have to look into why. At the very least, we should add an
> "--enable-toolbar" option IMHO.
How long ago is that? I fixed a number of issues.
> BTW, wip/modular-xorg-server is working very well (NetBSD/i386). If
> you wish to try it, see the commit message for relevant issues. It's
> worthy of mention that the bcopy patch in that package indeed does
> increase performance significantly.
The slow copy vs bcopy? I don't think it is entirely correct, but I will
work on a better patch.
> I'm starting to work on updating the MesaLib packages for 7.0.1.
Yeah, been looking at that too.
> What's your opinion on how I should integrate NetBSD DRI support?
> Will we support DRI for other platforms?
DragonFly and FreeBSD are of interest as well.
> It's been suggested that libGL be split out into its own package.
I don't have a problem with that, should be fine.