Subject: Re: chat/pidgin
To: None <email@example.com>
From: Jan Danielsson <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 05/29/2007 03:35:41
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Klaus Heinz wrote:
>> For me, it would be useful. Though Pidgin and Finch can be considered
> This indicates, IMO, that there should be two packges chat/pidgin
> and chat/finch. Both would use the same source archive and probably
> share a Makefile.common.
I'm making three packages, like in FreeBSD ports: chat/libpurple,
chat/pidgin and chat/finch.
I'm not entirely sure how to work around some issues with the options
framwork and multiple packages, but I'll figure it out.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (NetBSD)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----