Subject: Re: net/netcat6 and !inet6
To: Adrian Portelli <email@example.com>
From: Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/25/2007 10:13:52
On 3/25/07, Adrian Portelli <email@example.com> wrote:
> Jukka Salmi wrote:
> > Hi,
> > some months net/netcat6 was changed to require `inet6' because
> > (according to the CVS log message) "you *can't* disable IPv6 in
> > netcat6".
> > However, netcat6 works fine without IPv6; I just built it (`./configure
> > --disable-ipv6') on a NetBSD 3.1_STABLE system which was built with
> > MKINET6=no and runs a kernel without `options INET6'.
> > IMHO net/netcat6/options.mk should be reverted to rev 1.1. Any comments?
> > Regards, Jukka
> >  http://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-changes/2006/11/28/0010.html
> I just tested r1.1 of options.mk on a NetBSD 3.x system that is IPv6
> enabled with a -inet6 in my mk.conf. By the looks of it netcat6 honors
> this and installs the nc6 binary with IPv4 support only.
> I'm sure tv@ had a reason for doing this though . . .
IIRC, it requires definitions for AF_INET6, inet_ntop(), and
gethostbyname2() even if you do something like --disable-ipv6. I
can't remember the exact reason, and my pkgsrc tree is currently in
limbo (as I'm waiting for Panix to increase my Xen disk space
allotment so I can pull down a tree again).
That said, what's the point of netcat6 without... ipv6?
-- Todd Vierling <firstname.lastname@example.org> <email@example.com> <firstname.lastname@example.org>