Subject: Re: mplayer & qt?
To: Julio M. Merino Vidal <email@example.com>
From: Tom Spindler <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 09/18/2006 12:49:32
> >> >and I would argue that it should be turned off by default, since it is
> >> >far too heavy-weight.
> >> But in that case you are providing a default binary package that will
> >> not work nicely on a KDE desktop.
> [...] But there will
> certainly be binary-only users that want SDL support and we should not
> force them to rebuild anything in that case.
So... why do the binary builds have to use the default options?
Why can't (or shouldn't) they have everything on by default?