Subject: Re: share/examples vs. CHECK_INTERPRETER (was: Re: what to do about CHECK_INTERPRETER=yes results?)
To: None <pkgsrc-users@NetBSD.org>
From: Klaus Heinz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 07/05/2006 21:16:50
> On Thu, Jun 29, 2006 at 01:55:26PM +0200, Roland Illig wrote:
> > If we decide that share/examples is added automatically to
> > CHECK_INTERPRETER_SKIP, this would indeed shut up.
> I said before, I'm fine with that. The same for share/doc.
> emul will need some special handling as well, since absolute path and
> relative path have to be checked in some situations.
This would get my vote as well.
Nobody else spoke up, so could we please add share/examples and