Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/licenses

[Greg Troxel <gdt%lexort.com@localhost>]

> Added Files:
>       pkgsrc/licenses: eclipse-v2.0-license
>
> Log Message:
> Add "Eclipse Public License - v 2.0" as found in
> https://github.com/junit-team/junit5/blob/main/LICENSE.md

This seems to be Free per FSF and Open per OSI:

  https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#EPL2
  https://opensource.org/license/epl-2-0/

and thus should not have the -license suffix.

We already have epl-v1.0 so this presumably should move to epl-v2.0.

There is eclipse-license but that contains cpl-1.0 so I consider that a
bug.  It is used by

./wip/eclipse/Makefile:LICENSE= eclipse-license
./wip/py-amply/Makefile:LICENSE=        eclipse-license
./wip/java-swt/Makefile:LICENSE=        eclipse-license
./wip/py-ibmiotf/Makefile:LICENSE=      eclipse-license
./security/py-asyncssh/Makefile:LICENSE=        eclipse-license
./devel/eclipse/Makefile:LICENSE=       eclipse-license

Someone(tm) should go over those and see if eclipse-license is really
correct.