Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/lang/ruby

[Takahiro Kambe <taca%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

In message <20170621145514.GM22442%joyent.com@localhost>
        on Wed, 21 Jun 2017 15:55:14 +0100,
        Jonathan Perkin <jperkin%joyent.com@localhost> wrote:
> * On 2017-06-21 at 14:11 BST, Takahiro Kambe wrote:
> 
>> Module Name: pkgsrc
>> Committed By:        taca
>> Date:                Wed Jun 21 13:11:19 UTC 2017
>> 
>> Modified Files:
>>      pkgsrc/lang/ruby: rails.mk
>> 
>> Log Message:
>> Overhaul framework of Ruby on Rails to support coexistence of rails32
>> and rails42.
>> 
>> * Rename RUBY_RAILS_VERSION to RAILS_VERSION.
>> * Remove detection of installed Ruby on Rails.
>> * Add ${RUBY_RAILS} to PKGBASE of each Ruby on Rails' pacakge.
> 
> Should we add rails to mk/pbulk/pbulk-index.mk so that each
> combination is built?
Above change would not create multiple package from one pkgsrc
direcotry, such as building ruby23-readline and ruby24-readline
from devel/ruby-readline.

It change PKGBASE only.

Previously:

devel/ruby-activesupport32 => ruby23-activesupport-3.2.x.tar.gz
devel/ruby-activesupport42 => ruby23-activesupport-4.2.x.tar.gz

Now:

devel/ruby-activesupport32 => ruby23-activesupport32-3.2.x.tar.gz
devel/ruby-activesupport42 => ruby23-activesupport42-4.2.x.tar.gz

So, binary packages could be installed as the same time,
ruby23-activesupport32 and ruby23-activesupport42.

A few packages could build with depending ruby-activesupport32 or
ruby-activesupport42, but their binary packages dose not change their
names as before.

So, it might be added to pbulk-index but no strong requirement for me.

Best regards.

-- 
Takahiro Kambe <taca%NetBSD.org@localhost>