Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/xulrunner

[Aleksej Saushev <asau%inbox.ru@localhost>]

  Hello,

Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost> writes:

>> I don't understand it at all!
>> Why don't you do that in WIP instead?
>> 
>> It is true that pkgsrc-current may be less stable than released,
>> but since when it has become assumed that pkgsrc-current may be
>> non-functional for sure?
>
> I believe the problem of 21.0 is fixed in 22.0.
> Of course, I can remove devel/xulrunner and re-add it when 22.0 is
> released.
> Which is better for pkgsrc?

If this doesn't last for less than few days, it would be better to
unbreak the package.

To elaborate, I don't mind temporary breakage caused by routine
development process. It is knowningly updating frequently used package
to broken version that sounds strange to me.

(Same applies to X.org, but that's separate story, I have to rely on
others' words.)


-- 
BECHA...
   CKOPO CE3OH...