Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/devel/libtool-fortran

[Ryo ONODERA <ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost>]

Hi,

From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>, Date: Sat, 18 May 
2013 00:10:04 +0200

> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 06:58:22AM +0900, Ryo ONODERA wrote:
>> What is the best way to fix build of blas/lapack?
> 
> See question on pkgsrc-users. The root of the problem is that f2c and
> modernish Fortran implementations are not ABI compatible.
> I believe that moving to a saner default Fortran is the best approach.

I have just read 
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/pkgsrc-users/2013/05/15/msg018068.html .
I understand that using consistent Fortran compiler is important.

blas have USE_LANGUAGES=c fortran77 line.
I have no idea which blas really needs fortran77 or not.
If fortran77 is really needed (g95 is not supported), should we have
libtool-fortran77?
Or is the following best situation? 
libtool-fortran's FC section is for g95, and F77 section is for g77?

--
Ryo ONODERA // ryo_on%yk.rim.or.jp@localhost
PGP fingerprint = 82A2 DC91 76E0 A10A 8ABB  FD1B F404 27FA C7D1 15F3