[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/databases
1. remove completely PG_SUBPREFIX support, then add CONFLICTS
2. revive improved PG_SUBPREFIX support, then avoid CONFLICTS
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 06:50:48 +0900, Aleksey Cheusov <cheusov%tut.by@localhost>
I don't know it is it is expected, but PG_SUBPREFIX will only affect to
You are right. PG_SUBPREFIX is also mentioned in other PGs but
set only in PG90.
Have a look to what was in the previous revision.
postgresql-90-* (including pg90 modules) conflicted with everything,
i.e. pg83, pg84, pg91 and pg92 (also including all possible modules).
PG_SUBPREFIX variable was completely ignored.
So, my patch doesn't introduce any regression.
As about PG_SUBPREFIX, I think in its current form it should just be
completely removed and reimplemented in a different way, if we want to
avoid conflicts between different PGs. For example, install *all* PGs
with uniq subprefix by default and implement a meta package
databases/postgresql with pkg_alternative mechanism for mapping
executables to bin/.
OBATA Akio / obache%NetBSD.org@localhost
Main Index |
Thread Index |