Jens Rehsack <rehsack%googlemail.com@localhost> writes: > On 02/01/10 11:00, Tobias Nygren wrote: >> On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 09:33:21 +0000 >> Jens Rehsack<sno%netbsd.org@localhost> wrote: >> >>> Log Message: >>> Updating pkg_rolling-replace (set new version 0.19): >>> >>> - Add option '-D' to tune "USE_DESTDIR=" and set this defaultly to 'NO' >>> - Add option '-j' to tune "MAKE_JOBS=" (Default: unset) >> >> I don't think it is a good idea to replicate mk.conf functionality. > > This is not the idea behind. I use mk.conf for my default things as > pkgsrc developer. There I test with USE_DESTDIR, with and without > MAKE_JOBS etc., but as a NetBSD user - when wanting my pkg tree > updated, I'm not interested in breaking in the middle because of mk/ > changes or packages without DESTDIR support. This is for the developer > part - and I separate between them. > >> Also, I think USE_DESTDIR=yes is the right way forward for pkg_rr and >> would prefer to see remaining issues fixed instead. > > With this change, DESTDIR issues wont break simple usage of pkgsrc. I > understand your arguments (and the intension behind joerg@'s changes), > but I'm primary interested in keeping my system up and running. Since > I'm off-site (and mostly without Internet access or at least very > expensive) a lot of time and might refresh pkgsrc tree and distfiles > at weekend and rebuilding during the week should break my system. I see your point, but I think the right fix is instead to revert the un-discussed not-adequately-tested change to make destdir the default before it really worked. (I don't mean the last few odd packages without support - I mean working nicely with 'make replace'.)
Attachment:
pgpGpxadTyVJX.pgp
Description: PGP signature