On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 00:12:52 +0900, Martti Kuparinen <martti.kuparinen@i=
ki.fi> wrote:

>> And, secondly, why is it GNU-GPL-v[23], the "GNU-" bit is
>> unnecessary. Or maybe we should call the BSD ones
>
> I'd call it "GPL-v[23]" (and LGPL-v[23]).

GPL is just "General Public License", whose?
IMO need prefix "GNU".

>> 	Berkeley-BSD-4clause
>
> IMO this is a too long name...

BSD =3D=3D Berkeley Software Distribution.
IMO "Berkeley-BSD" is tedious expression.
-- =

"Of course I love NetBSD":-)
OBATA Akio / obata@lins.jp