Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 09:48:23PM +0100, Roland Illig wrote:
> 
>>Can you suggest a shorter message that contains all details that may be 
>>necessary? My reasons for making the message that long are:
> 
> 
> Part of my problem is that it adds another long message for typical
> build errors like missing includes or libraries, thereby obscuring the
> real issue. I think in most cases, noone cares about this level of
> detail. It is useful to get them for some issues, so making it part e.g.
> of PKG_DEBUG_LEVEL=1 is completely fine with me. But the current default
> is IMO not that helpful.

I actually like having the unwrapped command show up.  This is 
especially true when looking at build logs from other machines where it 
can be tough enough to figure out whats going on.

-Dan