Subject: Re: CVS commit: pkgsrc/security/openssl
To: Jan Schaumann <>
From: Lubomir Sedlacik <>
List: pkgsrc-changes
Date: 08/25/2003 20:02:10
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Mon, Aug 25, 2003 at 01:52:10PM -0400, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> "Jeremy C. Reed" <> wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Aug 2003, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> >=20
> > > Patch Makefiles to use @MAKE@, which then, after patching, is
> > > substituted with the actual ${MAKE} (can't use "MAKE=3D ${MAKE} -f
> > > Makefile.ssl").
> >=20
> > Thanks for doing this.
> >=20
> > I haven't looked at your patches. But maybe this is the same as my
> > PR #22509.
> Actually, yes.  I just closed that PR.  JFTR: Using didn't
> seem suitable to me, as we do not want to artificially depend on GNU
> make.

you seem to misread the comment.  i was suggesting to link
${MAKE_PROGRAM}, not GNU make.  that is, provide an appropriate "make"
for the package in the $PATH.  it doesn't matter whether is it GNU make
or bmake, the dependency is handled way before we get to this point.
this would solve all such issues without dozens of patches.


-- Lubomir Sedlacik <>                   --
--                  <>                   --

Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (NetBSD)