On Sun, Jul 13, 2003 at 12:48:45PM +0100, Nick Hudson wrote:
> On Sunday 13 July 2003 10:32, wulf@ping.net.au wrote:
> 
> > Thanks for info as I wasn't aware about this. Would it be ok to just delete
> > the patch file again and use REPLACE_PERL?
> 
> Al committed some new stuff that might mean REPLACE_PERL has been replaced 
> with a more generic mechanism. I haven't paid close attention.

I committed a more general mechanism to substitute for any interpreter,
not just Perl, but I retained REPLACE_PERL for backwards compatibility.
This is one of these situations. Please use REPLACE_PERL for this job.
 
Regards,
Alistair