On Mon, 25 Mar 2002, James Chacon wrote:

> Is there any reason that all of the places lang/gcc gets included shouldn't
> just do the following?:
>
> Check if the installed compiled is GCC_VERSION and only pull in lang/gcc if
> GCC_VERSION > the installed version or GCC_FORCE or something similiar
> is set.
>
> The issue is that there are egcs style checks in a bunch of places now and
> there's no real reason since they all do the same thing.
>
> It's not like lang/gcc is actually special patches. It's literally the
> diffs from the in-tree gcc pulled out. I worked on a patch set last night
> to bring it up to date so I could enable it for the remaining ported platforms.

	Seems like a very sensible plan.

-- 
		David/absolute		-- www.netbsd.org: No hype required --