I really think is kinda lame to do to folks...What if someone installs apache
and is working on something that's not in pkgsrc? They should now have 
scripts which don't install the proper dependencies to work?

In any case for now I backed this out and put the apache buildlink into 
ap-aolserver (which caused this).

We really need somewhere that has an overview of all of the buildlink files :-)

James
>
>On Tue, Feb 05, 2002 at 06:45:30AM +0200, James Chacon wrote:
>> 
>> Module Name:	pkgsrc
>> Committed By:	jmc
>> Date:		Tue Feb  5 04:45:30 UTC 2002
>> 
>> Modified Files:
>> 	pkgsrc/www/apache: Makefile
>> 
>> Log Message:
>> Apache installs apxs which is a perl script so the package needs to depend on
>> perl as well.
>
>We've avoided this up till now by adding a BUILD_DEPENDS on perl for packages
>that use apxs to build dynamic extension modules (all of the ap-*) packages.
>The apache/buildlink.mk file will actually do all of this automatically for
>package Makefiles that use it.  I don't believe the apxs script has any
>utility other than this purpose.  Do we really need that full dependency on
>perl?
>
>	-- Johnny Lam <jlam@jgrind.org>
>
>
>
>