[pkgsrc/trunk]: pkgsrc/mk/misc Readded the check for NO_SKIP and documented t...

[rillig <rillig%pkgsrc.org@localhost>]

details:   https://anonhg.NetBSD.org/pkgsrc/rev/7a7d18f3b4fe
branches:  trunk
changeset: 522132:7a7d18f3b4fe
user:      rillig <rillig%pkgsrc.org@localhost>
date:      Sun Dec 03 21:47:26 2006 +0000

description:
Readded the check for NO_SKIP and documented that variable.

diffstat:

 mk/misc/can-be-built-here.mk |  14 ++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diffs (35 lines):

diff -r b1934cf943b5 -r 7a7d18f3b4fe mk/misc/can-be-built-here.mk
--- a/mk/misc/can-be-built-here.mk      Sun Dec 03 19:56:49 2006 +0000
+++ b/mk/misc/can-be-built-here.mk      Sun Dec 03 21:47:26 2006 +0000
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# $NetBSD: can-be-built-here.mk,v 1.1 2006/11/26 08:37:03 rillig Exp $
+# $NetBSD: can-be-built-here.mk,v 1.2 2006/12/03 21:47:26 rillig Exp $
 #
 # This file checks whether a package can be built in the current pkgsrc
 # environment. It checks the following variables:
@@ -8,6 +8,16 @@
 # * NOT_FOR_UNPRIVILEGED, ONLY_FOR_UNPRIVILEGED
 # * PKG_FAIL_REASON, PKG_SKIP_REASON
 #
+# It also depends on the following internal variables:
+#
+# NO_SKIP
+#      When defined, the checks in this file are skipped. It is called
+#      NO_SKIP because the code that skips builting the package should
+#      _not_ be run.
+#
+#      XXX: It's weird to have three negations in such a short variable
+#      name.
+#
 
 _CBBH_CHECKS=          # none, but see below.
 
@@ -127,7 +137,7 @@
        @:; ${_CBBH_MSGS:@m@${ERROR_MSG} ${m} ; @}
        @${FALSE}
 
-.if ${_CBBH} == "no"
+.if !defined(NO_SKIP) && ${_CBBH} == "no"
 # FIXME: check-vulnerable is only used here because it is depended
 # upon by each of the "main" pkgsrc targets. Probably its name should be
 # generalized, and both check-vulnerable and _cbbh should depend