[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkgsrc 2008Q4 NetBSD 4.0/powerpc bulk build results 20090122.0015
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:07:40PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:46:21 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger
> <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:43:56PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:30:27PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> >> > fonts/libfontenc 49 joerg%NetBSD.org@localhost
> >> This package has been in most of the bulk builds. Is it supposed to
> >> work or is it a native vs. modular thing? If it's not supposed to be
> >> used with native X, shouldn't it be marked accordingly?
> > Because the native X on NetBSD doesn't provide .pc. Given that the same
> > issue also occurs for certain modern Gnome/KDE components, I don't think
> > this is a problem of libfontenc, but of x11-links.
> Just an interest, if native X NetBSD-4 (XFree86) provides *.pc file,
> x11/libfontenc is usable with Xfree86?
> The other hand, x11/liboldXrandr is usable with modular X?
If they provide the pkgconfig files and they are new enough, yes.
liboldXrandr exists simply because I refuse to mess up libXrandr for the
Main Index |
Thread Index |