Re: pkgsrc 2008Q4 NetBSD 4.0/powerpc bulk build results 20090122.0015

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:07:40PM +0900, OBATA Akio wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:46:21 +0900, Joerg Sonnenberger 
> <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost> wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 10:43:56PM +0000, David Holland wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:30:27PM +0100, Havard Eidnes wrote:
> >>  > fonts/libfontenc           49      joerg%NetBSD.org@localhost
> >>
> >> This package has been in most of the bulk builds. Is it supposed to
> >> work or is it a native vs. modular thing? If it's not supposed to be
> >> used with native X, shouldn't it be marked accordingly?
> >
> > Because the native X on NetBSD doesn't provide .pc. Given that the same
> > issue also occurs for certain modern Gnome/KDE components, I don't think
> > this is a problem of libfontenc, but of x11-links.
> 
> Just an interest, if native X NetBSD-4 (XFree86) provides *.pc file,
> x11/libfontenc is usable with Xfree86?
> 
> The other hand, x11/liboldXrandr is usable with modular X?

If they provide the pkgconfig files and they are new enough, yes.
liboldXrandr exists simply because I refuse to mess up libXrandr for the
same reason.

Joerg