joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost wrote: > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:53:24AM -0500, Jan Schaumann wrote: > > Unless, of course, we make the decision to say we _always_ want C99 and > > consider packages that don't do C99 as broken. But we don't do that for > > gcc, do we? > > Well, stdint.h is definitely part of the Single Unix Specification and > used a lot. I expect a lot of other packages to be broken for the same > reason. How about this: I run a bulk-build with CFLAGS set to include "-c99", and we see what the breakage is. If it's wildly more successfull than without, we'll add it for IRIX as a default. -Jan -- If you can read this, you're not the president.
Attachment:
pgpMxaJ0cHGTl.pgp
Description: PGP signature