Subject: Re: pkgsrc IRIX64 6.5/mipseb bulk build results 2006-03-01
To: None <email@example.com>
From: None <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date: 03/02/2006 19:17:16
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 12:25:17PM -0500, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> email@example.com wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:53:24AM -0500, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> > > Unless, of course, we make the decision to say we _always_ want C99 and
> > > consider packages that don't do C99 as broken. But we don't do that for
> > > gcc, do we?
> > Well, stdint.h is definitely part of the Single Unix Specification and
> > used a lot. I expect a lot of other packages to be broken for the same
> > reason.
> How about this:
> I run a bulk-build with CFLAGS set to include "-c99", and we see what
> the breakage is. If it's wildly more successfull than without, we'll
> add it for IRIX as a default.
Let's see what breaks first. Does adding -c99 turn on any *strict*
modus? E.g. does it just add the c99 stuff or turn off the C99