--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

joerg@britannica.bec.de wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 11:53:24AM -0500, Jan Schaumann wrote:
> > Unless, of course, we make the decision to say we _always_ want C99 and
> > consider packages that don't do C99 as broken.  But we don't do that for
> > gcc, do we?
>=20
> Well, stdint.h is definitely part of the Single Unix Specification and
> used a lot.  I expect a lot of other packages to be broken for the same
> reason.

How about this:

I run a bulk-build with CFLAGS set to include "-c99", and we see what
the breakage is.  If it's wildly more successfull than without, we'll
add it for IRIX as a default.

-Jan

--=20
If you can read this, you're not the president.

--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFEByp8fFtkr68iakwRAsOiAKCgfXAurQdVVXIIl1O4oA78LviIQQCffjo3
0WHBQf5RqNJ871eFftPTbok=
=oORu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--TRYliJ5NKNqkz5bu--