On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:59:36 -0800
Ben Collver <collver@peak.org> wrote:

> It is properly linked on your system because you have mjpegutils
> installed.
> 
> Since I wanted to keep mplex small and simple, I did not register
> mjpegutils as a dependency.  I had accomplished this with
> patches/patch-aa, but it got removed.

Ahh right... We could make mplex depend on mjpegutils or fix it
again, anyway why mplex is a separate package? it's part of mjpegtools
and I don't see a reason to fix the package every time mjpegtools
is updated.