--J2uG6jHjFLimDtBY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 02:07:34AM +0100, Thomas Klausner wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 21, 2005 at 12:10:43PM +0000, Alistair Crooks wrote:
> > 2. the visual difference between '>' and '<' is much greater than
> > that of '+' and '-', making >< changes much more visually obvious at
> > a glance. In addition, there is very little visual difference
> > between the '+' and '-' characters, leading to much more
> > concentration needed to differentiate old from new.
>=20
> I changed the format because gdt@ requested it, since he finds the +-
> format easier to read. It seems there are different views colliding
> here. Perhaps other people want to provide their opinion on the
> subject? After all, I read the diffs when I create them, so I don't
> really care either way.

i prefer the default diff format for these reports.  as al suggested,
it's easier to quickly parse in this case.

--=20
-- Lubomir Sedlacik <salo@{NetBSD,Xtrmntr,silcnet}.org>   --

--J2uG6jHjFLimDtBY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDq1BkiwjDDlS8cmMRArnQAJ4854s5kx9n4FS6waLiDq0962WsLQCdEWNM
/Iyo/ZTQogv6QJmL9BuaSPw=
=An7Y
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--J2uG6jHjFLimDtBY--