Subject: Why are the build logs called .html?
To: None <pkgsrc-bulk@NetBSD.org>
From: Roland Illig <rillig@NetBSD.org>
Date: 11/11/2005 10:26:00
For example, the devel/cppunit/.broken.html file contains a leading
"<pre>", which is not closed. The file's contents is not passed through
a to-html filter either.
Are there any objections to renaming the files to .broken.txt instead of
.broken.html? And, of course removing the leading "<pre>"? The code that
writes the "<pre>" is misplaced anyway, as it writes that tag already to
the .broken file, which should really be considered text/plain.