Jan Schaumann wrote:
Hi, At the moment, our bulk-reports will sort the broken packages alphabetically. While this seems to make sense, I often find myself searching for (a) packages that I maintain and (b) packages that have the biggest breakage. How do others read the bulk-reports? I'd be tempted to change the order of broken packages by breakage, so that it's easy to figure out which packages need immediate attention.
That could make Thomas' diffs more difficult. But otherwise I support the change request.
Or what about a "top 10 breakers" list at the top of the summary? Roland