Jan Schaumann wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> At the moment, our bulk-reports will sort the broken packages
> alphabetically.  While this seems to make sense, I often find myself
> searching for (a) packages that I maintain and (b) packages that have
> the biggest breakage.  How do others read the bulk-reports?
> 
> I'd be tempted to change the order of broken packages by breakage, so
> that it's easy to figure out which packages need immediate attention.

That could make Thomas' diffs more difficult. But otherwise I support 
the change request.

Or what about a "top 10 breakers" list at the top of the summary?

Roland