pkgsrc-Bugs archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/59891 (Lost XFCE and many primary packages with pkg upgrade when packages were "refreshed")
The following reply was made to PR pkg/59891; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: "John L. Males" <netbsd.open.source%softhome.ca@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost
Cc:
Subject: Re: pkg/59891 (Lost XFCE and many primary packages with pkg upgrade
when packages were "refreshed")
Date: Wed, 27 May 2026 16:56:14 +0000
Hello,
Please be advised as result of this bug I reported I no longer use,
will use, or suggest NetBSD be used.
I did submit supporting information as requested for this bug
shortly after requested that never was added to this bug report
likely due to NetBSD bug system bug(s).
Added to this never reported as consequence of this bug as severe
bugs in NetBSD base I had been working on that this bug caused the
months of tests and supporting data to be lost. This was not a
file system issue, but state loss of detailed NetBSD base related
information that was lost from the extensive testing. I would
class such NetBSD base bugs I found not on purpose, but as result
of normal use of NetBSD base that my extensive software
engineering background that include Operating Systems made it
extremely easy for me to identify the cause. The fact it was a
severe NetBSD base issue required me to ensure the issues were well
documented and ensure issues could be duplicated with ease. It was
easy to duplicate the foundation issues, but takes weeks to
test/document the consequence of the foundation issues of NetBSD
base. This bug lost months of data and testing effort to use to
report the NetBSD base issues.
There were severe install bugs of NetBSD that took me days to find
how to prevent. What I had to do to work around the NetBSD install
bugs was very extreme and without doing so introduces completely
random bugs that can result in data loss at some random point in
future, be it few days to few months or more than year later. These
same very serious NetBSD install bugs also would cause many other
serious NetBSD bugs that would be impossible to identify and
duplicate outside of the affected specific NetBSD install.
A clean NetBSD base install has serious basic bugs of own when the
random related NetBSD bugs are avoided using extreme measures to
prevent.
There are a number of other basic and severe NetBSD bugs not related
to NetBSD base that often are severity 1 bugs.
The bug reported by this issue is the final and clearly very basic
reason I stopped using NetBSD. Again due to response for
information for this issue that places responsibility and risk to
user to determine if bug is fixed is not acceptable in my
opinion. A very sad and concerning lack of confidence with
respect to this bug.
Overall very sad as despite the other bugs I had identified and
working to document that takes alot of time to do so there are
many elements done so well with NetBSD I was willing to take the
time to document to report. This bug caused a complete loss of
confidence as never is my years of using many different OS
ignoring Windows in my professional career. I have used Unix as
my personal OS since 1998, hence I am very familiar with many Unix
variants.
Given I stopped using NetBSD as result of this bug because I
cannot trust the NetBSD package manager (never had package manage
wipe out install packages to base in my 50+ years of using many many
Operating Systems at same time including IBM Mainframe different
Operating Systems (VM, MVS, OS/VS1, OS/MFT, Power/VSE, VSE, AIX, et
al) and custom Operating Systems this issue should be closed. I
will never know nor willing to be lab test subject to determine if
this issue is fixed nor willing to use NetBSD again to find this
issue occurs or occurs worse than reported at some random point in
future be it weeks or months on basis of "In the meantime, we have
bumped packages to 2026Q1." that suggests the cause of this bug has
not been identified, ergo not fixed.
John L. Males
Toronto, Ontario
Canada
2026-05-27 15:55+0000 UTC eMail Start
2026-05-27 16:56+0000 UTC
2026-05-27 12:56-0400 EDT
*****Not GPG/PG Signed*****
On Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 18:18:32 +0000 (UTC)
From: bsiegert%NetBSD.org@localhost
To:
pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost,pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,bsiegert%NetBSD.org@localhost,netbsd.open.source%softhome.ca@localhost
Cc: Subject: Re: pkg/59891 (Lost XFCE and many primary packages
with pkg upgrade when packages were "refreshed")
> Synopsis: Lost XFCE and many primary packages with pkg upgrade
> when packages were "refreshed"
>
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: bsiegert%NetBSD.org@localhost
> State-Changed-When: Tue, 26 May 2026 18:18:31 +0000
> State-Changed-Why:
> In the meantime, we have bumped packages to 2026Q1.
> Is this still an issue?
>
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index