RE: pkg/51244: wm/xmonad is missing the xmonad binary

[Anindya Mukherjee <anindya49%hotmail.com@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/51244; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Anindya Mukherjee <anindya49%hotmail.com@localhost>
To: "gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost" <gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>, "pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost"
	<pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost>, "gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost" <gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost>,
	"pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost" <pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost>, Anindya Mukherjee
	<anindya49%hotmail.com@localhost>
Cc: 
Subject: RE: pkg/51244: wm/xmonad is missing the xmonad binary
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2016 02:21:25 +0000

 I see, it seems like it. Thanks for pointing it out. I'm still puzzled abou=
 t how I can run xmonad. I did try searching on the web but didn't see anyth=
 ing helpful.
 
 Regards,
 Anindya
 ________________________________________
 From: Thomas Klausner [wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost]
 Sent: June 15, 2016 12:50 AM
 To: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost; gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost; pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost;=
  anindya49%hotmail.com@localhost
 Subject: Re: pkg/51244: wm/xmonad is missing the xmonad binary
 
 The following reply was made to PR pkg/51244; it has been noted by GNATS.
 
 From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
 To: NetBSD bugtracking <gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>
 Cc:
 Subject: Re: pkg/51244: wm/xmonad is missing the xmonad binary
 Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 09:48:05 +0200
 
  On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 07:15:01AM +0000, anindya49%hotmail.com@localhost wrote:
  > I installed xmonad-0.12 from pkgsrc, built from source. The install comp=
 leted without errors, but I noticed that there was no xmonad binary install=
 ed.
 
  I have no idea how this is supposed to work, but the Makefile contains:
 
  # don't need default binary
  SUBST_CLASSES+=3D 1
  SUBST_STAGE.1=3D  pre-patch
  SUBST_FILES.1=3D  xmonad.cabal
  SUBST_SED.1=3D    -e "s|executable xmonad|executable xmonad+    buildable:=
  False|"
 
 
  So this looks like it's intended this way?!
   Thomas