Re: pkg/51198: lang/g95 fails to build on Linux

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/51198; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%bec.de@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost, gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost, pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
	bsiegert%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: pkg/51198: lang/g95 fails to build on Linux
Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 22:43:17 +0200

 On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 08:15:01PM +0000, Benny Siegert wrote:
 > The following reply was made to PR pkg/51198; it has been noted by GNATS.
 > 
 > From: Benny Siegert <bsiegert%gmail.com@localhost>
 > To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Cc: pkg-manager%netbsd.org@localhost,
 >  gnats-admin%netbsd.org@localhost,
 >  pkgsrc-bugs%netbsd.org@localhost,
 >  bsiegert%NetBSD.org@localhost
 > Subject: Re: pkg/51198: lang/g95 fails to build on Linux
 > Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2016 22:14:39 +0200
 > 
 >  > You can decide the Fortran implementation to use. The point of g95 as
 >  > default was and still is that it is lighter than a full gcc49 or
 >  > whatever build.
 >  
 >  Given that g95 does not build on modern Linux systems: can we flip the =
 >  default *for Linux* to gfortran?=
 
 Well, you can just as well install the Fortran frontend of your
 distribution, right?
 
 Joerg