pkgsrc-Bugs archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]

Re: pkg/50645: Submission to add new package textproc/py-docx



The following reply was made to PR pkg/50645; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: David Holland <dholland-pbugs%netbsd.org@localhost>
To: gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/50645: Submission to add new package textproc/py-docx
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 21:31:56 +0000

 On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 06:35:01AM +0000, David H. Gutteridge wrote:
  >  (By the way, from what I've seen, it doesn't appear there's a way of
  >  specifically denoting test-only dependencies in pkgsrc. Would the
  >  typical approach in this case be to note them as build dependencies,
  >  or leave them out entirely?)
 
 Maybe we should have TEST_DEPENDS. It's annoying to have a bunch of
 unused stuff yanked in when you aren't intending to test something.
 
 Not sure how to fit it into the existing framework though...
 
 -- 
 David A. Holland
 dholland%netbsd.org@localhost
 


Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index