Re: pkg/49817 (math/py-rpy 2.3.0 doesn't build on amd64 7.99.4)

[Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>]

The following reply was made to PR pkg/49817; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Thomas Klausner <wiz%NetBSD.org@localhost>
To: NetBSD bugtracking <gnats-bugs%NetBSD.org@localhost>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: pkg/49817 (math/py-rpy 2.3.0 doesn't build on amd64 7.99.4)
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 10:39:53 +0200

 On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 07:00:01AM +0000, Alexander Nasonov wrote:
 >  I have the same problem with Python 3.3.
 
 Ok, I've fixed packaging for all python versions.
 
 >  But a missing file is a minor problem compared to non-working module.
 >  
 >  Can you please try pythonX.X -m rpy2.tests?
 >  
 >  $ python2.7 -m rpy2.tests
 >  The module "singledispatch is required for Python < 3.4
 >  Traceback (most recent call last):
 >    File "/usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 162, in _run_module_as_main
 >      "__main__", fname, loader, pkg_name)
 >    File "/usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/runpy.py", line 72, in _run_code
 >      exec code in run_globals
 >    File "/usr/pkg/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rpy2/tests.py", line 17, in <module>
 >      raise ie
 >  ImportError: No module named singledispatch
 
 This has also been fixed, but I now see
 # python3.4 -m rpy2.tests
 rpy2 version: 2.5.6
 - built against R version: 3-1.1--66115
 - running linked to R version: R version 3.1.1 (2014-07-10)
 E
 ======================================================================
 ERROR: __main__ (unittest.loader.LoadTestsFailure)
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File "/usr/pkg/lib/python3.4/site-packages/rpy2/tests.py", line 43, in load_tests
     suite_robjects = loader.discover('robjects', pattern, rpy_root)
   File "/usr/pkg/lib/python3.4/unittest/loader.py", line 261, in discover
     raise ImportError('Start directory is not importable: %r' % start_dir)
 ImportError: Start directory is not importable: 'robjects'
 
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 Ran 1 test in 0.001s
 
 FAILED (errors=1)
 #
 
 No idea what that is supposed to tell me.
  Thomas