[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: pkg/47322 (pkgsrc/print/cups update for LIBS_SSP to include -libssp for solaris)
The following reply was made to PR pkg/47322; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Richard PALO <richard.palo%free.fr@localhost>
Subject: Re: pkg/47322 (pkgsrc/print/cups update for LIBS_SSP to include -libssp
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2013 17:04:31 +0200
Le 16/12/12 20:47, hauke%NetBSD.org@localhost a Ã©crit :
> Synopsis: pkgsrc/print/cups update for LIBS_SSP to include -libssp for
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: pkg-manager->sbd
> Responsible-Changed-By: hauke%NetBSD.org@localhost
> Responsible-Changed-When: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 19:47:22 +0000
> Over to maintainer.
No response for quite awhile, so I'll reiterate with an extract of the
> But, if GCC decides to use TLS canary for -fstack-protector,
> then it ought to avoid -lssp_nonshared -lssp, while if
> it decides not to use them, then it should force -lssp_nonshared -lssp
> (as glibc doesn't provide __stack_chk_guard on the architectures
> that provide TLS canary).
In absence of any pertinent objections, I'll push this with the builtin
mit-krb5 gssapi fixes affecting cups this weekend or so.
BTW - I don't believe suppressing the 'LDFLAGS+= -lssp_nonshared' in
favour of 'CFLAGS+= -fno-stack-protector' is necessarily a great
alternative... That is, unless there are some great arguments for this
Main Index |
Thread Index |